Talk:I, a Woman

This article was nominated for deletion on 22 October 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

A fact from I, a Woman appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 December 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the popularity of the 1965 Scandinavian erotic film I, a Woman inspired Andy Warhol to make his experimental film I, a Man?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/December. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/I, A Woman.

Wikipedia

Denmark Low‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: Nordic

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the Nordic cinema task force.

From the article author

The article is crap. but I'm not really up to speed on the complexities of setting up a Wikipedia article, and I'm not going to take the time to learn. The film exists. Do what fix-up it needs. I don't normally read movie reviews, so I've no idea what is actually needed or normal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by A Karley (talk • contribs) 13:36, 22 October 2014‎

@A Karley: It's done. Really was not too difficult. I apologize for someone else not seeing the article's potential. Check my edits to see how and what was needed, and take a look at MOS:FILM for future film articles. Thank you for your contribution, and be well. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 09:24, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Huge improvement

Thanks to Schmidt above for his huge improvements. He's obviously someone who knows his way around Wikipedia (I just know my way around information ; when all the alternative systems have been dead for a decade, then the remaining single system may be considered worth learning. Whatever system that is.)

None of the information Schmidt presents conflicts with the little information I had on the film.

I suspect that the "consider for deletion" flag can now be lifted. Aidan Karley (talk) 10:38, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@A Karley:

Not my first rodeo and you are very welcome. See WP:CLOSEAFD. They run their course, and the tag will be removed upon closure. But even if "involved", the nominator can even close it himself under Speedy Keep #1 if no one else feels a delete merited and he sees his concerns have been met. The only "conflict" with your original contribution was the film's release year. Be well, Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 11:33, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]