Jump to content

Talk:I Am... World Tour (album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleI Am... World Tour (album) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 8, 2012Good article nomineeListed

Can someone update the pictures?!!?

[edit]

Can someone please update the pictures, i would but i don't know how to.. the real official covers have been released, if you can, update with the pictures below I AM... World Tour Standard/Blu-Ray Cover.

I AM... World Tour DVD/CD Deluxe Edition Cover.

For expanding

[edit]

My love is love (talk) 09:40, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Beyonce's I Am…World Tour sold 37K and 31K its first two weeks in November and December 2010. >>> the greatest total for a music video

[edit]

Jivesh1205 (Talk) 18:08, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Live Instrumentals Album

[edit]

Every link in the "Live Instrumentals Album" section is dead. I tried to find something but I couldn't. What's hapenning? My love is love (talk) 11:29, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, did you check Amazon? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 11:44, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes and this was the only thing that came out but it's about I Am... Yours: An Intimate Performance at Wynn Las Vegas. My love is love (talk) 16:55, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Lemme try something. If i don't reply, please remind me. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 17:59, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RS

[edit]

Review

[edit]

More

[edit]

My love is love (talk) 18:52, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Charts

[edit]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:I Am... World Tour/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Calvin999 (talk · contribs) 18:52, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Info box

[edit]
  • Do you know the length?
  • Use the date template for the date released

Lead

[edit]
  • for her own Parkwood Pictures. → Perhaps say what this is. A production company?

Background and release

[edit]
  • No issues.

Production and filming

[edit]
  • Say that Parkwood Pictures is her own production company.
  • "It contains tour footage from 108 shows that took place in 78 cities, 32 countries and 6 continents in presence of 1.1 million fans around the world." → Source?

About the show

[edit]
  • "Several songs were shortened from their actual live length and some songs such as "Me, Myself and I" were omitted completely. Several interludes in the show have also been omitted and instead transitions are made with behind-the-scenes footage." → Sources?

Marketing and promotion

[edit]
  • No issues.

Critical reception

[edit]
  • No issues. At least you know not to include a ton of quotes!

Chart performance

[edit]
  • "37.000 copies in its first week and 31.000" → How come you've used full stops (.) for these two only?

Track listing

[edit]
  • No issues.

Personnel

[edit]
  • No issues.

Charts and certifications

[edit]
  • Can you mark up the tables for WP:ACCESS. You know when one column in shaded.
  • Put the year end table into two separate ones for both years.
  • DVD chart and Album chart are two different widths.
  • Pretty sure we don't use the Chart precession and succession table anymore as it's redundant.

Release history

[edit]
  • Mark the table up for ACCESS

References

[edit]
  • I can't see anything wrong.

Summary

[edit]

On hold :). You always write very good articles so there's hardly anything to amend. Aaron You Da One 13:07, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Everything done, except the Access thing. I really don't know how to do that. My love is love (talk) 13:26, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'll do it for you. It's a bit of a speciality of mine haha. Passing. Aaron You Da One 13:35, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much!! :)) My love is love (talk) 13:36, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]