Talk:2014 celebrity nude photo leak/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: FunkMonk (talk · contribs) 21:36, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

• Hi, I'll review this article. FunkMonk (talk) 21:36, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
• There are many citations in the intro, but that isn't necessary, since it is only supposed to be a summary of the article body, with no unique info. FunkMonk (talk) 21:36, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
  •  Not done From WP:LEADCITE: Any statements about living persons that are challenged or likely to be challenged must have an inline citation every time they are mentioned, including within the lead. sst✈ 03:43, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

One citation for a statement in an intro summary is one thing. Three citations for one statement in the intro is unnecessary. But not a very big deal either way. FunkMonk (talk) 20:59, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

• As an extension of the above comment, no citations or information should only be present in the intro.
• "On August 31, 2014, a collection of almost 500 private pictures of various celebrities, mostly women, and with many containing nudity" Since the intro is only supposed to be a summary of the article with no unique info, you need to explain everything present there (eg. "On August 31, 2014, a collection of almost 500 private...") in the article body as well before going into such details.
• "under names such as "Celebgate"" Only mentioned in intro.
• "which allowed them to make unlimited attempts at guessing victims' passwords." Only mentioned in intro.
• "There are claims that unreleased photos and videos exist." I'd add "also exist", reads a bit clearer.
• "through the use of two-factor authentication" Could be explained in parenthesis. That is common for articles with "technical" terms.
• "such as phishing and brute-force guessing." Could be explained.
• " Notifications will be provided whenever data is restored to a device via iCloud and after logging into iCloud via a web browser.[66] in addition to existing notifications when a user's iCloud password is changed. Additionally, Apple will broaden and encourage the use of two-factor authentication in future versions of its software and operating systems, such as the then-upcoming iOS 8." Why is this present tense? It refers to actions that have likely already been made, and the surrounding text is past tense.
• There is some overlinking of words.
• "The FBI said that it was" When?
• "errera is just one of several people under investigation and the FBI has carried out various searches across the country." Since this is all the way form 2014, I'm sure there must have been further developments since?
• You there, SSTflyer? FunkMonk (talk) 09:13, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

• • @FunkMonk: After checking the sources again, you may as well fail this. Some statements are not supported by the sources cited, and the article may need a major rewrite. Sorry for the inconvenience. sst✈ 14:52, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

If you want to fix it, I can leave the nomination open for as long as it takes. FunkMonk (talk) 15:05, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Since you have not responded for days, I assume you're not interested, so will now fail this. FunkMonk (talk) 22:07, 16 March 2016 (UTC)