Talk:Hydropneumatic device

I was going to create a "Water Hammer Arrestor" article, but I decided it makes more sense to redirect that title to here, and then add a reference in the Water Hammer article, so I will do so now. Spalding 18:45, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is there an expert in the house?

This page seems to spend a lot more time on Internet search terms than the actual devices. If somebody who's familiar with these things can fix the article, it would be greatly appreciated. RedRollerskate 21:51, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edited, please review

I have reviewed and edited this article. Plead advise if this is what is required. I can provide any relevant information to this subject near effortlessly.

Why all the fuss over terminology ? ?

The SAME comments can be made for virtually ANY technical subject across languages ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.223.232.1 (talk) 19:48, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just delete it

This page doesn't resemble an article at all, and doesn't manage to communicate anything useful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.70.134.104 (talk) 02:30, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Misuse of term

I'm an engineer, popped on for a nice graphic illustration of some different pulse dampener designs and get this muck. The semantics of this are ignoring plenty of physics while not helping anyone. I vote delete. 198.5.164.51 (talk) 05:37, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]