Talk:Hubballi railway division

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Hubli railway division. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150319003737/http://www.indianrail.gov.in/ir_zones.pdf to http://www.indianrail.gov.in/ir_zones.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160128044328/http://www.indianrailways.gov.in/StationRedevelopment/AI%26ACategoryStns.pdf to http://www.indianrailways.gov.in/StationRedevelopment/AI%26ACategoryStns.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304045206/http://www.cr.indianrailways.gov.in/uploads/files/1432447500773-23.Passenger%20Amenities%20PDF.pdf to http://www.cr.indianrailways.gov.in/uploads/files/1432447500773-23.Passenger%20Amenities%20PDF.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:59, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 21 August 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Move to Hubballi railway division. This discussion has gone stale, so despite the absence of any clear !votes, I consider this to be sufficiently uncontroversial. The comment from Toddy1 is convincing that the form Hubballi is used for the name of this division. I am moving to a lowercase title to be consistent with others of the type even though this was not the originally requested title. (non-admin closure) Rcsprinter123 (talk) 16:09, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

---

Hubli railway division → Hubballi Railway division – WP:TITLECON Anubhavklal (talk) 05:05, 21 August 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. ❯❯❯ Raydann^(Talk) 16:19, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Looking for uninvolved editor to move this page please Anubhavklal (talk) 07:02, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

• Speedy close as not moved. You also started a move discussion at Talk:Hubli#Requested move 20 August 2023 for the city named Hubli, which you asset should be moved to Hubballi. As with this discussion, you merely asserted that the common name is the name you chose. Wikipedia move discussions should be made on the basis of evidence. In addition, the names of the city and the railway division are linked. It would make more sense to have one discussion that covered all the Hubli/Hubballi articles that would be affected by a move discussion. So please can we close this discussion - and later have a new move discussion that meets these points. (And if the proposer presents no evidence for the move, to it speedy close it.)-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:52, 26 August 2023 (UTC) The proposer has provided evidence in support of the move in response to the above post. So strikethrough has been applied to comments based on the lack of evidence.

  Agree on point that both articles need to be corrected. But I am not sure if they are to be linked together. It is absolutely ok if city name is different than the railway station name or the division name, if ghey are referred so in common use. Eg Lucknow Charbagh station is called so though city name is not Charbagh. Anubhavklal (talk) 08:36, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

  The railway station page

  is already moved to Hubballi Junction railway station Anubhavklal (talk) 08:38, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/karnataka/hubballi-division-of-south-western-railway-records-10-growth/article67202253.ece

.

http://www.totaltraininfo.com/division/hubli.php

.

https://swr.indianrailways.gov.in/view_section.jsp?lang=0&id=0,7,275,397

.

Almost in all places, official as well as news sites, it is reffered as Hubballi railway division.

Many more evidences can be cited similar to above Anubhavklal (talk) 08:31, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Note: WikiProject Trains has been notified of this discussion. ❯❯❯ Raydann^(Talk) 16:18, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

• Comment: Is “Railway division” a proper noun? If not, it should remain uncapitalised in lowercase. Fork99 (talk) 16:39, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

• Given that other Indian railway divisions have titles in the format Prayagraj railway division it would be better either to keep it as Hubli railway division or to move it to Hubballi railway division. Titles for the same kind of subject should not differ in form or structure without good reason. (Wikipedia:Consistency in article titles) -- Toddy1 (talk) 18:47, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

• Comment on evidence provided by the proposer. The evidence supports what the proposer says.

• The Hindu link given as as evidence by the proposer calls it "Hubballi Division of South Western Railway".^[1]
• totaltraininfo.com calls it "SSS Hubballi division". It also uses "SSS Hubballi Railway Division", but the capitals appear to be because the term appears in the article title.^[2]
• I corrected the third URL provided by the proposed (and have informed him/her in their talk page). This calls it "HUBBALLI DIVISION".^[3]

-- Toddy1 (talk) 17:29, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Thanks Anubhavklal (talk) 19:54, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.