Talk:Huasteca

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mesoamerica, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.MesoamericaWikipedia:WikiProject MesoamericaTemplate:WikiProject MesoamericaMesoamerica articles

Mexico Mid‑importance

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Discrepancy between map and description

The text reads "parts of the states of Tamaulipas, Veracruz, Puebla, Hidalgo, San Luis Potosí, Querétaro, and Guanajuato". The map shows the Huasteca to only include parts of Veracruz, Hidalgo, San Luis Potosí and perhaps Puebla. The region certainly extends farther inland than shown. On the other hand I never heard of any corner of Guanajuato belonging to the Huasteca. 2001:4CA0:4403:0:14E0:6EDB:E1E6:3867 (talk) 14:22, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on La Huasteca. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/662qIqEKC?url=http://www.arqueomex.com/S2N3nDOSIER87.html to http://www.arqueomex.com/S2N3nHuasteca79.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:43, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on La Huasteca. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:51, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 29 January 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 21:56, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

La Huasteca → Huasteca – Although both Huasteca and La Huasteca are used in English publications, it appears more often as Huasteca (without the Spanish definite article La). Here are several examples I found showing English use of Huasteca:

an academic book: The Huasteca: Culture, History, and Interregional Exchange (2015)
an academic journal article: "The Huasteca Rain Forest: An Environmental History" (2011)
a museum's article about its collection: "5. Archaeology of the Huasteca: The Ekholm Collection"
a travel article in The Globe and Mail newspaper (2017)
a culture news article "Huapango: The Sound of the Huasteca" on the MexicoNews Network website (2015)

By comparison, I found one clear example of English use of La Huasteca:

a travel article in Time magazine: "Visit the Jungles of La Huasteca" (2009)

I also found examples of writing that mixes La Huasteca and Huasteca on the same page:

a cultural performance group website: Mexican Dance Company
a travel article on the Explorando México website: "La Huasteca Potosina in Mexico"

Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(geographic_names) gives more advice on such cases, but generally prefers the name that is more commonly used, which would be Huasteca. Krubo (talk) 05:27, 29 January 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. SITH (talk) 13:54, 6 February 2019 (UTC)--Relisting. SITH (talk) 14:19, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The Huasteca is used yes, but not just Huasteca. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:40, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support per WP:CONCISE and for WP:CONSISTENCY with other Spanish (etc.) terms and phrases in English Wikipedia. WP:THE applies at least in principle, except in cases where style guides tell us that a non-English definite article is de rigeur for the case in question (as for The Hague when referred to in English by its Dutch name Den Haag, and for El Niño in reference to the weather pattern). For example, the French language agency's article is at Académie française not "La Académie française", and its Spanish equivalent is at Royal Spanish Academy with Real Academia Española as a WP:BOLDSYN in the lead, neither with a definite article attached, though one would be used in running text in either language ("according to the Royal Spanish Academy", "según la Real Academia Española"). — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 11:28, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom and per SMcCandlish. If Haustica alone can be found in use in English, then the definite article can be disposed of in an English encyclopedia. bd2412 T 21:16, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.