Talk:Howrah–Barddhaman main line

India: West Bengal / Railways Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject West Bengal (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indian railways (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Trains Mid‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	March 14, 2015

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 09:51, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Howrah–Bardhaman Main Line → Howrah–Bardhaman main line – The double-redirect fixing bot salted the redirect before I got around to fixing the case here. Sources use a combination of things like mainline, Main line, main line, but never Main Line, making it clear that it's not a proper name. Dicklyon (talk) 22:47, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think the proposed move and similar ones are okay. Thanks for making me aware of it. - Chandan Guha (talk) 07:00, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.