Talk:Hope Atlanta

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Issues

The reliability of the "J. Al-Mashat interview" source is in question because there is no indication who J. Al-Mashat is, or who conducted the interview, or where it was published. If the interview has not been published, it is not publicly available for review to verify the facts in question, and therefore does not constitute a valid reference.

With this fact in question, the very notability of HOPE Atlanta comes into question. If it is not verifiably the first major non-profit organization to racially integrate, than it is not notable independent of its parent organization. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 16:41, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will work to improve my sourcing. Everything is correct, but I understand your concern. Are there any others I should know about before I re-submit it? Also, HOPE Atlanta is now a separate entity from Traveler's Aid International, so it is relevant in itself. They are simply partners now. I will restate this agian somewhere. Thanks for your input. This is a historically and currently significant organization and I would appreciate any help you can offer to keep this article available to the public. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jme179 (talk • contribs) 16:56, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]