Talk:Holographic interferometry
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
‹See TfM›
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
The discovery of holographic interferometry
[edit]I assume that this discussion is based on the paper on the Journal of Holography and Speckle by K. Haines (which I have not been able to get hold of). It would be much improved if this could be made clear, and just what it is said in this paper reported more clearly.
The patent should be properly referenced. Epzcaw (talk) 19:12, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
The patent issue - not NPOV, and possibly original research
[edit]This section contains no references to any external sources, and appears to be supporting one side in this dispute. I believe it should either be supported by reliable external sources or deleted. Epzcaw (talk) 16:03, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Holographic interferometry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080422232242/http://www.eng.warwick.ac.uk/oel/previous/interferometry.htm to http://www.eng.warwick.ac.uk/OEL/previous/interferometry.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:47, 25 January 2018 (UTC)