Talk:Holden Commodore (VS)

	Australia portal Holden Commodore (VS) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Automobiles Low‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Holden VF Commodore which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 05:16, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Holden Commodore (VS). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:49, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The mythical Toyota Lexcen T5

There is a common error on the web, which is repeated here, that the Toyota Lexcen corresponding to the Holden Commodore VS Series II, has a model designation of T5. This is complete fantasy. All Toyota Lexcen models corresponding to the VS, be they Series I or Series II, have a model designation of T4. As with the preceding T1 (VN), T2 (VP) and T3 (VR) models, Toyota never changed the model designation when they updated from Series I to Series II.

I had a 1997 Toyota Lexcen (therefore corresponding to VS Series II, one of the last ever built under the Holden-Toyota agreement) and it was designated as T4 in the Owner's manual and likewise had T4 as the model code within its VIN. Similarly, if one looks on the web for other of these late Lexcen vehicles, where the VIN is given, this shows T4 as the model code, for example : https://www.swuc.com.au/stock/1997-toyota-lexcen-sedan-csi-t5-150804

If you care for the accuracy of the information here, please fix this. I've fixed it in the past and someone reverts it, so I'm not going to waste any more of my time on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.70.43.107 (talk) 11:46, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]