Talk:Holby City series 1/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 14:03, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: I fixed one disambiguation link.diff

Linkrot: No dead links found

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
This article is reasonably well written and follows the Manual of Style. I made a few minor copy edits.diff
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
The artcile is well referenced, no dead links, references are reliable sources, no dead links
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Broasd, thorough and focussed
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
I am happy that this article meets the GA criteria, so am happy to list it. Congratulations. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 14:28, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your review, and also for the copy edit. Some of the typos that had slipped through were shameful, thank you for catching them! Frickative 15:33, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]