Talk:History of military nutrition in the United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Food and drink

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Comments

Recommendations/suggestions for improvement? Although I am not the original author, I have been tasked with finding quality references for a number of statements made in this article, and will definitely entertain ideas on how to improve it. Thanks!MrZbignew (talk) 19:18, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MILHIST assessment

This is a solid article with a misleading title. It seems to be purely about the American armed forces. Military nutrition existed before 1775 and in other armies. Recommend renaming to History of Nutrition in US Armed Services or similarMonstrelet (talk) 17:45, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Though the same when I saw it, have done so. GraemeLeggett (talk) 16:23, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of suggestions

I have removed the review template as the article seems generally fine. I have a couple of suggestions for improvement which you may decide to use or may not:

use of the {{cite web}} will embed the url links in the citations themselves and give the article a "cleaner" look in my opinion;
the quotation marks should be straight, not stylised or curly according to the WP:MOS (this is not a major thing, just something you could fix if you have time);
the lead should be expanded a bit more (can be up to four paragraphs) so as to adequately summarise the article;
the addition of a couple of images would break up the text a little and serve to make it a bit more visually appealing.

Anyway, good work so far. Cheers.—AustralianRupert (talk) 01:00, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

A huge THANK YOU to those of you who have reviewed the article and recommended changes! I will be monitoring the article, and making changes as time permits. MrZbignew (talk) 12:54, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Title still misleading

Why is it titled "US Military" when it's actually about the US Army? 2601:600:C300:361D:78FA:EAFA:93A8:CF02 (talk) 06:36, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on History of military nutrition in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:33, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of military nutrition in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100721103950/http://nsc.natick.army.mil/index.htm to http://nsc.natick.army.mil/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:53, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy over food preparation

Is it right to put the controversy section in the article? There is one report available. Ahri Boy (talk) 04:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]