Talk:Stylonurina

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Stylonurina article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Arthropods Low‑importance

	Arthropods portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arthropods, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of arthropods on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArthropodsWikipedia:WikiProject ArthropodsTemplate:WikiProject ArthropodsArthropods articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hi

please don't delete this page. I have recently created hibbertopteroid track, which linked here. That link used to point to a perfectly reasonable little stub (although something is wrong, because I don't see the stub on the history).

At any rate, it's certainly not a speedy. Give me some time and I'll add some halfway decent content.

Robinh 21:41, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If the article you are looking for existed previously, it must have been at a different title. There is no record of edits being deleted from from this title. As it stands right now, the article should have already been speedy deleted as empty. It's not healthy to confuse the first-time noob wikipedia user who might click on Special:Random and get sent there. Casts the encyclopedia in a dim light. Out of curiousity, what is the article supposed to be about? If nobody can figure that part out, there is no potential for expansion, otherwise somebody might have helped you write it by now. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 21:59, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi FoN. I'm still confused. I can't have imagined that "perfectly reasonable stub" (can I?) but there is absolutely no trace of it anywhere on wikipedia.

I've added some minimal content, and can add more.

best wishes, Robinh 10:01, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]