Talk:Heuglin's gazelle
Appearance
Heuglin's gazelle has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 22, 2020. (Reviewed version). |
A fact from Heuglin's gazelle appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 June 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:23, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
( )
... that Heuglin's gazelle (illustration pictured), last seen in Eritrea reportedly during the Italian colonial rule (19th to 20th centuries), was sighted again in the country in 2019?Sources: [1] [2]
5x expanded by Sainsf (talk). Self-nominated at 22:52, 6 May 2020 (UTC).
- ALT1, more idiomatic:
... that Heuglin's gazelle (illustrated), reportedly last seen in Eritrea during Italian colonial rule (19th to 20th centuries), was sighted again in the country in 2019?- an actual date would be nice. Johnbod (talk) 14:12, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks Johnbod, I like ALT1. Sources don't mention the date it was sighted, but the month is most probably June as the earliest report (from the government) was on 29 June. I would suggest sticking to the year. Sainsf · (How ya doin'?) 14:31, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- I meant the Italian period year actually, but the source I looked at was vague. Johnbod (talk) 15:24, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Striking both hooks because parenthetical comments, such as "(19th to 20th centuries)", are not allowed in hooks (see WP:DYKSG#C9). Getting a better colonial date, as Johnbod suggests, is one way to deal with the issue; another is phrasing like "over a century" or whatever the actual time period is that it hasn't been seen. Sainsf, you'll need to supply a new hook (or hooks). Thanks, and sorry for the bad news. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:49, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- BlueMoonset, thanks for the comment. I am not sure about the actual date or time period, and the source does not mention it anyway, but we can be sure that the colonial rule existed "over a century back". I have rephrased the hook: Sainsf (t · c) 18:09, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- ALT2: ... that Heuglin's gazelle (illustrated), reportedly last seen in Eritrea over a century back during Italian colonial rule, was sighted again in the country in 2019?
- I meant the Italian period year actually, but the source I looked at was vague. Johnbod (talk) 15:24, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- ALT1, more idiomatic:
- Full review needed now that a hook is set. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:31, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- This article is 5x expanded and a recently promoted GA and is new enough and long enough. The image is in the public domain, the ALT2 hook facts are cited inline, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. A QPQ has been done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:19, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Heuglin's gazelle/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 12:14, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Comments
- You could create Eritrean gazelle as a viable redirect to here.
- Done
- " nearly 67 cm" sounds oddly precise. All examples are "nearly 67cm" tall? Is that 66cm?
- Only one source gives the shoulder height and the number is indeed 67, presumably an average but it doesn't mention the sample size.
- "measure 15 to 35 cm (5.9 to 13.8 in)." in length.
- Done
- Second lead para is a bit lumpy, several very short sentences, not flowing nicely.
- I have combined and rephrased a few lines, let me know how it looks.
- "an altitude of 1,400 m" do you really mean elevation?
- Yes, fixed
- "with less than 2,500" fewer
- Done
- "They are spaced 119–173 cm (47–68 in) apart at the base" the horns are spaced more than a metre apart at their base???
- My bad, put cm instead of mm. Fixed
- "(16–37 in) .[6][4] " no space after parenthesis and ref order in numerical order.
- Fixed
- " close to the fence" what fence?
- Of the enclosure, added.
- "(nearly six months)" not necessary.
- Removed
- " calf is born. Calves are born" repetitive.
- Fixed
- Explain/link IUCN.
- Linked
- '(Heuglin, 1868)' in the infobox but 1863 in prose.
- Corrected to 1863
That's all I have, so I'm putting it on hold. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 09:55, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
- All comments addressed. Cheers, Sainsf (t · c) 16:17, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
- Cool beans, I'm happy with the amendments and promoting to GA. Good work. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 10:01, 22 May 2020 (UTC)