Jump to content

Talk:Heuglin's gazelle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk05:23, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Illustration of Heuglin's gazelle
Illustration of Heuglin's gazelle

5x expanded by Sainsf (talk). Self-nominated at 22:52, 6 May 2020 (UTC).[reply]

I meant the Italian period year actually, but the source I looked at was vague. Johnbod (talk) 15:24, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Striking both hooks because parenthetical comments, such as "(19th to 20th centuries)", are not allowed in hooks (see WP:DYKSG#C9). Getting a better colonial date, as Johnbod suggests, is one way to deal with the issue; another is phrasing like "over a century" or whatever the actual time period is that it hasn't been seen. Sainsf, you'll need to supply a new hook (or hooks). Thanks, and sorry for the bad news. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:49, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • This article is 5x expanded and a recently promoted GA and is new enough and long enough. The image is in the public domain, the ALT2 hook facts are cited inline, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. A QPQ has been done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:19, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Heuglin's gazelle/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 12:14, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Comments

  • Done
  • " nearly 67 cm" sounds oddly precise. All examples are "nearly 67cm" tall? Is that 66cm?
  • Only one source gives the shoulder height and the number is indeed 67, presumably an average but it doesn't mention the sample size.
  • "measure 15 to 35 cm (5.9 to 13.8 in)." in length.
  • Done
  • Second lead para is a bit lumpy, several very short sentences, not flowing nicely.
  • I have combined and rephrased a few lines, let me know how it looks.
  • "an altitude of 1,400 m" do you really mean elevation?
  • Yes, fixed
  • "with less than 2,500" fewer
  • Done
  • "They are spaced 119–173 cm (47–68 in) apart at the base" the horns are spaced more than a metre apart at their base???
  • My bad, put cm instead of mm. Fixed
  • "(16–37 in) .[6][4] " no space after parenthesis and ref order in numerical order.
  • Fixed
  • " close to the fence" what fence?
  • Of the enclosure, added.
  • "(nearly six months)" not necessary.
  • Removed
  • " calf is born. Calves are born" repetitive.
  • Fixed
  • Explain/link IUCN.
  • Linked
  • '(Heuglin, 1868)' in the infobox but 1863 in prose.
  • Corrected to 1863

That's all I have, so I'm putting it on hold. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 09:55, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All comments addressed. Cheers, Sainsf (t · c) 16:17, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Cool beans, I'm happy with the amendments and promoting to GA. Good work. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 10:01, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]