Talk:Hedge fund replication

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Thanks for the contributions

Hedge Fund Replication as a method for achieving hedge fund like returns without liquidity, transparency and fraud risks has been around for over five years. However, it is only in the past couple of years, as investors have discovered how dangerous these risks are, that hedge fund replication is gaining more interest. As the hedge fund market becomes crowded, more people are realising that the average hedge fund is not producing alpha, just a form of alternative beta. For much lower fees, access to this alternative beta can be obtained using hedge fund replication methodologies. I believe that this is a huge growth area in the hedge fund arena, and certainly worthy of its own wikipedia page.

I would like to thank everyone who has contributed to the making of this page, and have been very impressed by the manner in which the improvements have been carried out. I have been pleasantly surprised by my first Wikipedia experience!! Thank you... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.123.62.50 (talk) 08:53, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]