This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
The controversy is fully sourced by a link to a transcript of Harry Smith's own words.
Your OPINION that Newsbusters is not "trustworthy" is irrelevant, and in any event silly in view if the link to the actual transcript.
Your OPINION that the section was added "to prove a point" us irrelevant, because the criticism of Smith is valid in view of his own words as evidenced by the transcript.
Your OPINION that only liberal conspiracy theorists like Andrew Sullivan and Media Matters should have their attacks against journalists memorialized in Wikipedia "controversy" sections is irrelevant, because apart from being unfair, all legitimate criticism backed up by an actual transcript of the subject's words is properly included. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.116.113.166 (talk) 23:24, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The transcript is moot. Video clips (which are copyright violations) are equally moot. In essence, the site (which is a blog, not a reliable source) presents its own interpretations of what the statements mean and selects which comments are important. If the interpretations are correct and significant, other, reliable, sources would cite them. No such other sources exist. If such sources do exist, we should be citing them, not your blog. I have asked you to discuss this at Talk:Kelly_O'Donnell. You have yet to do so. - SummerPhD (talk) 21:15, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The “infobox” lists Harry Smith’s birthplace as “Hammond, Indiana”, but the “Early life and education” section lists his birthplace as “Lansing, Illinois”. Which is correct? To make matters worse, the lone citation for “Early life and education” is a dead link. Lyttle-Wight (talk) 18:58, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]