Talk:CC Amfi/GA1
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:Hamar Olympic Amphitheatre/GA1)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Resolute (talk · contribs) 02:15, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- General
- Images are good
- Though it is not required for GA status, Alternative text for the images is preferred
- Sources look good
- No concern with close paraphrasing, given nearly all links are in Norwegian
- Lead
- "Other mayor events held at..." - Typo? I presume that is supposed to be "major"?
- As a general complaint, I've never really cared for listing one-off events as being tenants in the infobox. I won't suggest removal, just sharing a personal opinion.
- Construction
- Link Storhamar IL on first use
- "...but a research project coordinated by the Norwegian Institute of Technology make it possible to build the venue in wood." - Awkward statement. I assume that should just be "made it possible". It also makes me curious. Is the arena completely made of wood? If so, is that unusual in Norway?
- Facilities
- "...Unlike Lillehammer and Gjøvik, Hamar only uses the interest and not of the capital of their funds..." - Also a bit awkward. Perhaps just strike "of"? "Hamar uses only the interest, not the capital, of their funds [to cover any deficit]"?
- "...75 meters (246 ft) wise ..." - Typo. Should be "wide"
- "The venue has an official ice hockey spectator capacity for 6,091 spectators," - No need to say "spectators" twice. I would just remove the first use: "The venue has an official ice hockey capacity for 6,091 spectators"
- "During the 1994 Winter Olympics, Hamar Olympic Amphitheatre was used for figure skating and short track speed skating. It hosted 13 events, drawing an average of 5,554 spectators.[27] During the Olympics, Storhamar Ishall was used for warming up and training." - Second use of "During the Olympics" is redundant.
- Events
- I am not sure that the Nancy Kerrigan/Tonya Harding incident is particularly relevant to this article
- Maybe not the most relevant fact, but it's only half a sentence. Geschichte (talk) 13:42, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
- In the Ice hockey section, your uses of "Dragon's" should either be Dragons if speaking of the team in general, or Dragons' if referring to something the team possesses. i.e.: The Dragons' highest average... and The Dragons have played....
- Overall
A well written article overall. There are a few typos and a couple places where the wording is awkward, but you have touched on everything I would expect to see in an article about such a facility. I am placing this nomination on hold to give time to address the minor issues above. Regards, Resolute 02:15, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for the review. I am traveling in the Middle East as we speak (or should that be "write") and have very little time and access to the Internet. I will be back at home on 5 April and with your consent would be more than happy to take a thorough look at the comments and amend them at that time. I fear that at this time I do not have the time to do a thorough enough read-through to fix the issues, even if they are not the largest. Arsenikk (talk) 07:46, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
- I tried to fix the issues. Geschichte (talk) 13:42, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
- Looks good to me. I am now passing the article. Congrats to you both! Resolute 17:31, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
- I tried to fix the issues. Geschichte (talk) 13:42, 1 April 2012 (UTC)