Talk:LoadRunner
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Headline text
[edit]'''What is the latest LoadRunner version'''
11.5 is the latest version, And till now 5 new patches have been released. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.197.253.62 (talk) 07:57, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- Even better information would be a list of different versions and patches as not everyone is upgrading to the latest version quickly. Right now, 2014, I am not surprised to find sites using version 9.10 or 12.1. Maybe 11.00 or 11.04. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.229.45.136 (talk) 15:09, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
Extensive edits, references and corrections made to article
[edit]Extensive research was completed on this article. Numerous references now are included and the information has been updated. JLRedperson (talk) 22:04, 7 March 2010 (UTC) Renamed the page "LoadRunner" to the new name "HP LoadRunner" to reflect the new name since HP acquired Mercury. JLRedperson (talk) 23:01, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
What does not make this article an advertisement ?
[edit]Just wondering .. if it were a product from a smaller or unknown company , an article written in a similar fashion would be called an advertisement . and marked for speedy deletion .. Not that i want this article to be deleted nor do I consider this written like an ad , but I cant help and wonder what separates this from other similar articles . Leningrad (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 11:55, 15 October 2010 (UTC).
- Good comment - but I think this is a problem with showing how hard it is to describe a product on Wikipedia without getting it thrown out as advertisement. How do you describe something which actually is used by a lot of people without getting it marked as advertisement? I as a user of, say either a performance test tool or a CMS (content management system) want to know about the pros and cons of different products. Just like I, as a visitor or, say, Versailles or the Paris_Métro want to know more about the palace or the tube. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.229.45.136 (talk) 15:07, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
No longer *HP* LoadRunner
[edit]As the HP Software division was sold to MicroFocus, the program is no longer called HP LoadRunner, should the article be renamed?
AlexLehm (talk) 13:50, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on LoadRunner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150407070316/http://readwrite.com/2012/02/06/hp-aims-to-redefine-apps-perfo to http://readwrite.com/2012/02/06/hp-aims-to-redefine-apps-perfo
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:46, 4 January 2018 (UTC)