Talk:HMS Blonde (1819)

Military history: Maritime / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Hawaii Mid‑importance

	Hawaii portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hawaii, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hawaii on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HawaiiWikipedia:WikiProject HawaiiTemplate:WikiProject HawaiiHawaii articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

getting there

Yes, it should be British English since it was a British ship. I just did American out of habit. But is it really its own class? The article List of frigate classes of the Royal Navy gives it as Apollo class frigate. Any artwork of it available perchance? Thanks. W Nowicki (talk) 02:03, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blonde was a development of the Apollos, but to quite a different design. When I first added the infobox I had in mind there was more than one ship to this design, but now I check I see that she was the only one. Since she was a unique class but a development from an earlier one, something along the lines of 'a modified Apollo-class frigate' should be fine instead. There are images of the ship held in museum collections, I'm not sure if there are any digitised copies online. Benea (talk) 02:14, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Section name: Hawaii

I'd like to change the name of the section to "Voyage to Hawaii". Just calling it "Hawaii" suggests that the only place visited (or at least of any importance) was Hawaii. This is not the case! If I don't receive any negative responses within a few days, I'll make the change. I will (of course) check for any links to #Hawaii. Peter coxhead (talk) 11:10, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure yes, especially if you add more text talking about these other places (or Hawaii for that matter), that would be even better. I Generally used the HMS template for linkage. And of course it must have done something between 1826 and 1850 etc. Thanks. W Nowicki (talk) 18:13, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Name

Why was this ship called "Blonde". Its not a very obvious name for a ship.Eregli bob (talk) 02:38, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on HMS Blonde (1819). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130413012800/http://anglochinesewar42.com/index.php?p=1_24_HMS-BLONDE to http://anglochinesewar42.com/index.php?p=1_24_HMS-BLONDE

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:28, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]