Jump to content

Talk:HMAS Waller

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:HMAS Waller (SSG 75))

Main Article

[edit]

Added a table of contents, and I seperated the name info from the intro, and added to it slightly more, i also put in the 'Noteable Achievements' which could be expanded on, ill try to expand on it later (finding detailed info about achievements by subs seems to be pretty hard, they don't release much detailed info), also i added 'External Links' and am in the process of looking for a news article URL that mentions the facts in the 'notable achievements' section (all news sites that had anything have the story as expired now)--Nirvana- 03:42, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I added the side bar that im adding to all the Collins Class sub articles, info still needs to be verified--Nirvana- 03:42, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image

[edit]

Not sure if this image is too long, it was very difficult to find a good image of HMAS Waller, but if anyone has any good ones that are more similar in size to the ones on HMAS Rankin/Sheean/Dechaineux pages, it might look better--Nirvana- 03:42, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Conflicting info on Waller target

[edit]

This article says Waller fired a Mark 48 torpedo at the "decommissioned US destroyer the USS David R. Ray (DD-971), becoming the first submarine to successfully fire the MK 48 Mod 7 Common Broadband Advanced Sonar System (CBASS) variant of this torpedo." WIKIPEDIA'S entry for the David R. Ray, however, says it was sunk by fire from eight U.S. and Japanese ships, plus three aircraft. A website for the Lake Erie Ohana (http://www.lke-ohana.org/lke/2008/07/lake-erie-havin.html) confirms the latter claim. Does anyone know for sure the name of the ship sunk by Waller and CBASS? Dbm0500 (talk) 22:04, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"7200 SHP" ?

[edit]

Maybe I'm missing something? Three diesel engines making 1400 kw each equals 4,200,000 Watts. One hosepower is about 746 watts so it would have at most 5630 shp if we don't even mention frictional losses. So where does the shaft pick up this 28% increase in power? Is my thinking wrong or it there an error? Thanks- 76.171.125.202 (talk) 15:07, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The three 1,400 kW motors are not directly connected to the propulsion system. Their only purpose is to generate electricity, which is then stored in batteries. When underwater, the electricity is drawn from these batteries and directed to the electric motor. See the Propulsion section of the Submarine article for more info. -- saberwyn 01:40, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/collins/
    Triggered by \bnaval-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 10:51, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 19:37, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on HMAS Waller (SSG 75). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:13, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on HMAS Waller (SSG 75). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:34, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]