Talk:H. Hugh Fudenberg

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the H. Hugh Fudenberg article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

A fact from H. Hugh Fudenberg appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 October 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that in an interview with Brian Deer, H. Hugh Fudenberg claimed to be able to cure autistic children using his own bone marrow?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2013/October. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/H. Hugh Fudenberg.

Wikipedia

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Casewatch / Quackwatch

We mention "Casewatch" here in respect of this article on casewatch.org. Casewatch is a subsidiary site of Quackwatch and, since we do not have a Casewatch article, the wikilink has been to a section of the Quackwatch article dedicated to its subsidiary sites. Recently Milwaukeewobbly, in a series of edits with increasingly uncivil summaries, has been changing the link text to "Quackwatch" which is just ... wrong. Would appreciate a second opinion for a sanity check. Alexbrn ^{talk|contribs|COI} 07:38, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you follow the link "Casewatch," it takes you to a page subsection about QUACKWATCH. I am merely correcting an error. If you want the link to point to an article or website specifically about CASEWATCH, then, please provide that link.

Since you provided no explanations for your reversions of my edit, and since your revisions contained the original error, I concluded that you were vandalizing the page.

If, in the future you plan to edit Wikipedia pages, please provide an explanation for your edits I do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Milwaukeewobbly (talk • contribs) 18:39, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article being mentioned appears on casewatch.org; your edit provides false information by suggesting it's on Quackwatch. How about we get a third opinion from WP:3O? Please say if you agree on seeking a third opinion. Alexbrn ^{talk|contribs|COI} 18:44, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. In fact, I agree so much that I have already requested one: WP:3O#Active disagreements. Jinkinson talk to me 19:26, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Third opinion

I do not see any reason why the link text should not read 'Casewatch' (but still link to the same WP article). The text specifically refers to a web site and the site in question is Casewatch.org. Martin Hogbin (talk) 19:57, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Potassium???

Both the article and the source refer to misuse of the drug 'Potassium'. Surely there is a word missed out somewhere. Potassium is not a drug. Martin Hogbin (talk) 19:45, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maher, Gorski and anti-vax

Per WP:PSCI it needs to be plain Maher is espousing an extreme fringe view here, as Gorski makes explicit: his view is being presented too obliquely for this to be clear. My edit did the trick well, but has been reverted (twice). Alexbrn ^{talk|contribs|COI} 21:19, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gorki made his "in depth" investigation by doing a Google search and choosing the first website he saw. this is absurd and not wikipedic. Gorki is getting undue weight anyway. The original sentence is enough. this is not the crank website RationalWiki79.182.136.188 (talk) 21:39, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on H. Hugh Fudenberg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:40, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]