Jump to content

Talk:Greg Pikitis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleGreg Pikitis has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starGreg Pikitis is part of the Parks and Recreation (season 2) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 13, 2010Good article nomineeListed
January 18, 2011Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 11, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that "Greg Pikitis", an episode of NBC's comedy series Parks and Recreation, featured actress Rashida Jones dressed as Raggedy Ann?
Current status: Good article

Name

[edit]

I read the reason for the name change, but it was still not sound enough. Consistency in episode titles doesn't mean anything — there's no article on Wikipedia named "Greg Pikitis" or anything similar to it, so "(Parks and Recreation)" is useless. Not all articles have this after their name, only is an article with the same or similar name already exists. These are, I believe, the standard rules of WP:TVMOS and WP:NAME. I will not move it back now, but would like to see some comment as to why the page was moved in the first place. The Flash {talk} 21:26, 11 November 2009 (UTC) {{[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Greg Pikitis/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 23:13, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, well I've copy edited the article and changed what I thought needed to be changed. The article is fine to me and I would like to pass it as a Good article. Xtzou (Talk) 23:13, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • So, hearing no objections, I will go ahead and do it. I am always impressed when I can follow the plot! And this article has everything else in order, also.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: Pass!

Congratulations! A good article. Xtzou (Talk) 23:35, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How?

[edit]

They followed the kid and watched him constantly. then went to the office to see he trashed it. we know it was him from the ending. but when did he do it then given that they were watching him all the time? 82.4.97.209 (talk) 06:58, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]