Talk:Grauballe Man

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Denmark Low‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wig?

Is that his real hair or is that a wig? jengod 21:04, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's real, although it's not the original colour. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Niffux (talk • contribs) 17:25, 19 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Yup, it is his actual hair. Valentinian ^{T / C} 13:56, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Close up, you can also spot his stubble. RhinoMind (talk) 02:03, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Irreconcilable dates

The leder says the body was uncovered in 1952. The the third section ("Discovery, Preservation and Exhibition") says it was discovered in 1956 yet went on display in 1955. Could someone please sort the correct dates? 71.234.215.133 (talk) 00:17, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The body was likely examined for a few years after it was discovered, and then put on display. --GouramiWatcher ^(Gulp) 23:16, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gut contents

His gut contents are too interesting to pass over.--Wetman (talk) 16:17, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, didn't they find a large amount of ergot, which would've made him act like he was possessed? (cf Secrets of the Dead - Bewitched; argues the same thing happened in the Middle Age witch trials) Harshmustard (talk) 20:55, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Grauballe Man. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120327005337/http://www.moesmus.dk/da/udstillinger/moesgaard-museum/grauballemanden/ to http://www.moesmus.dk/da/udstillinger/moesgaard-museum/grauballemanden/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:00, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hgjsdb nvfsgyurebd

@Hgjsdb nvfsgyurebd: Could you please explain the deletion of the materials from the article? Could you please elaborate why it is false information? Thanks. SunDawn talk 09:06, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Facial reconstruction

No description or context, no source information whatsoever, dead link in the commons file. Totally worthless. 2A02:AA1:1640:F051:DCD9:E10:D5D5:1BFC (talk) 17:40, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]