Talk:Grand Council (Qing dynasty)

China: History High‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Chinese history (assessed as High-importance).

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related Page View Counts

Grand Council has been viewed 1245 times in 201202.
Grand Council (Switzerland) has been viewed 27 times in 201202.
Grand Council of Basel-Stadt has been viewed 70 times in 201202.
Grand Council of Neuchâtel has been viewed 63 times in 201202.
Grand Council of Fascism has been viewed 1339 times in 201202.

Note that Grand Council of Fascism gets about as many hits as Grand Council. Usage in the article itself suggests that "Grand Council" is commonly used to refer to that topic too. --Born2cycle (talk) 19:53, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: pages moved. Andrewa (talk) 04:09, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

– At least one of the other uses listed on Grand Council (disambiguation) gets about as many hits (see Talk:Grand Council#Related Page View Counts) as this article does indicating there is no primary topic for this name, and so the dab page should be at the base name, per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Born2cycle (talk) 19:53, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support. The present arrangement is just too counterintuitive. I was sure it must be a town in Iowa. Neotarf (talk) 20:22, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support, not obviously the primary topic. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 21:28, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support – the term is too ambiguous to support a primarytopic claim. Dicklyon (talk) 23:27, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support addition of valuable precision. Noetica^Tea? 03:44, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support per all of the above. $Tony (talk)$ 05:43, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Ok, now I'm scared. :-) --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 13:36, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Previous comments have said it all. I completely concur. Blueboar (talk) 22:08, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~. I'm scared too, Sarek. Jenks24 (talk) 16:00, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.