Talk:Gracie Gillam

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers / Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Quote

Could someone explain to me how that quote is in any way pertinent to Phipps' biography? Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 00:23, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Picture

Can someone please add this picture? It looks to me as though it can be used, in addition to what we have. And it is more recent and better I think.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/disneyabc/19041743986/in/photolist-anZq5c-ietpvH-v3N7Wm-v4inMp-v1DV5N-anZoAz-fGaEJJ-v3uavW-v1Erbu-u78KhR-uLqWYu-u78eue-sjb9HX-92S3Sx-nno8CH-9369ai-fyK4K9-fyK4VJ-fyuNbZ-fyuMjv-fyuMZP-fyuMxR-fyuLuP-fyK5TS-fyuMFa-uLGXww-jQA1mg-9368D8-9367wH-92S6JR-92VbrN-92VarA-92S2wn-92S6ct-92S5Gg-92S6Av-92VbWb-92S32P-fyuM6i-fyK4m9-s2BRcd-u6Yh5d-939ej1-4GsEPo-939fSW-v3uajU-uLoe7j-939fxf-92Vc9f

199.102.168.8 (talk) 02:20, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As the "portrait" pic? Wouldn't be a good choice, as it's not a headshot. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 03:07, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think I understand. Can someone then put this new picture in the article as a second, additional, more recent pic that is not a "portrait pic" then?

Or else, cut it down to the size of a portrait pic? I looked at the original of the pic that is now being used, by clicking through, and it looks like that is what they did. It had more in it, which they just cut out for what they used here. Thanks. --199.102.168.8 (talk) 22:36, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

199.102.168.8 – unfortunately I don't know much about images and copyright rules and such, and the use of Commons, so I can't be of any help on this. You might try asking at the WP:Help desk about this... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:38, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. 199.102.168.8 (talk) 22:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The copyright for that file is not appropriate for our use. See this for more information on which copyrights from flickr we can use. --Stabila711 (talk) 23:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that fast answer. I'm confused. I went to flickr, and searched for commercial use allowed. It gave me all these photos. https://www.flickr.com/search/?ytcheck=1&text=grace%20phipps&license=4%2C5%2C6%2C9%2C10

Is that not enough to make it an appropriate file? It's among those that say commercial use allowed. Eh -- but I see on what you linked to it says ND is no good. If not, is there another one that we could use that is better than the one we have, or as an additional one? Or are we stuck with what we have. Thank you. 199.102.168.8 (talk) 03:27, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you can find an image on Flickr that is marked with one of the copyrights we can use go ahead and upload it. It has to be marked with the proper tags in order to be valid but if it has the correct copyright it should be fine. Otherwise, we have to use what we have. Copyright law is really strict and for our purposes here it has to have been released under the proper licensing agreement in order to use it. Photos have to be available for commercial use and to be modified. The ND copyright means we can't modify it. So while some of those photos in that gallery you linked to are the correct copyright for us to use you have to double check each one you want to make sure. The Commons guide in my last response has the full list of acceptable copyright licenses from Flickr. If you respond again please make sure to include {{ping|Stabila711}} in your message along with your signature so I can be notified. Thanks! --Stabila711 (talk) 04:36, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I'm not sure I can find such a photograph. 199.102.168.8 (talk) 22:58, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Grace Phipps. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:13, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]