Talk:Gothia Cup

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Football: Sweden Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Swedish football task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

the biggest sport event? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.228.235.146 (talk • contribs) 17:19, 4 November 2008

"Players from Gothia Cup"

According to the article, 35,200 players participate each year. Some of them will, naturally, become successful football players. I don't see how it can be relevant to list some of them. How is this list ever going to be not arbitrary? How do you decide who's to be included and who's not? With the help of what sources? /Julle (talk) 00:30, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You should ask yourself if such information is relevant. The cups goal is to produce(atleast help) players reach the next level, so its clearly interesting for this article. Criteria and ref is not the problem here. There is plenty of reliable sources on the web. Please don't delete the section again. I created a similar one. Divine time (talk) 20:14, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously I asked myself and came to a negative conclusion. I would like to see more participation in this discussion. /Julle (talk) 16:47, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Remove the "age cheating"

Age cheating would be a really minor problem. It is sad to see it brought up as a main point. I suspect it is brought up as someone's personal agenda. I would rather remove that. (side point: so much else to cover, including previous results etc) — Preceding unsigned comment added by NMeden (talk • contribs) 10:02, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Gothia Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:01, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gothia Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:27, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]