Talk:Ghost Manor

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ghost Manor article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find video game sources: "Ghost Manor" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (6 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (2 participants)
Dr. Wily (8 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Actionpotential.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:22, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mario

Something about main character looking like mario? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.151.77.31 (talk) 18:41, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Streamlining this article

Hello everyone! I have begun the process of editing this article as a part of my Technical Editing class at Texas A&M University. I wanted to share the areas of the article I want to work on before I jump in to making any major edits.

The bullet points in sections "Characters", "Items", and "Scoring" do not meet Wikipedia's criteria for video game articles (WP:VGSCOPE).
The formatting of the "Gameplay" section could use some readjustment to clean up the display
The relevance of the "Xonox Development" needs to be revisited as the section lacks strong connection to the rest of the article.
The overall tone of a "manual or guidebook" that Wikipedia has marked (WP:VGSCOPE).

Actionpotential (talk) 20:12, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions for future editors

After comparing this article to the Chuck Norris Superkicks article mentioned, I have realized there are a few sections that almost explicitly ignore wikipedia's guidelines for video game articles (WP:VGSCOPE). The sections describing the list of items, scoring, and difficulty settings could potentially be deleted. Considering it would be deleting a major amount of content, I was not going to do it without running through here first and maybe handing it off to other editors for the future!

Actionpotential (talk) 02:56, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

One thing I forgot to mention! Some content of the sections I mentioned above might retain some relevance in accordance to the guidelines (WP:VGSCOP)) if they are incorporated as needed into the addition of "Plot" section which is highly needed. Actionpotential (talk) 03:00, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Xonox development section

Hello wikipedians, I will be deleting the section of Xonox development. While the information might be suiting for a different article, it is not exactly the case for this one. The section contains only one sentence pertaining to the actual video game and even at that, the content sentence does not hold much importance as to what the game is about. If others think this is a wrong move to make, you can visit my sandbox User:Actionpotential/sandbox to view the article as it was before my edit so that anyone can compare and make changes as they see fit!

Actionpotential (talk) 03:10, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

One other note! If someone sees a way to incorporate any absolutely necessary information from that section into an added "Reception" section I believe that would be a good edit! Actionpotential (talk) 03:59, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]