Talk:Georgia in the American Civil War

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Georgia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (U.S. state)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Template:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Georgia (U.S. state) articles

Top

This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state) To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Crooked Creek (Georgia), Ed Defore Sports Complex, Audery Mill Creek, More (Georgia)... More (U.S.)...
Assess : Rate articles from Unassessed Georgia (U.S. state) articles and Unknown-importance Georgia (U.S. state) articles.
Citing sources : Unreferenced Georgia (U.S. state) articles
Cleanup : Cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category.
Geographical coordinates : more Georgia (U.S. state) articles missing geocoordinate data
Infobox : Georgia (U.S. state) articles without infoboxes
Map : Wikipedia requested maps in Georgia (U.S. state)
Photo : Wikipedia requested photographs in Georgia (U.S. state)
Stubs : Work on stubs in articles in Georgia (U.S. state) stubs, Georgia (U.S. state) radio station stubs, Georgia (U.S. state) road stubs and Georgia (U.S. state) geography stubs.
Other : *Deletion sorting: Please see the collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Georgia (U.S. state) - compiled by WikiProject Deletion sorting
- Help out with articles placed in Category:Georgia (U.S. state) articles needing attention
- Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
- Tag the talk pages of Georgia (U.S. state)-related articles with the {{WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)}} banner.
- Get Georgia (U.S. state) to a featured article quality standard

Military history: North America / United States / American Civil War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	American Civil War task force

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008

Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 14:36, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Info Box has several structural errors

The info box on this article has several stylistic errors, i.e. brackets, image tags and more. This is more complicated than other info boxes I have dealt with, so I am at a loss as to how to correct the errors. A Softer Answer (talk) 21:10, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Page moved: it is very clear where this is going, so I won't raise the issue of soldiers from the Caucasus participating in the US Civil War. Ground Zero | t 17:00, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Georgia (U.S. state) in the American Civil War → Georgia in the American Civil War – Disambiguator is unnecessary here because no one will reasonably expect this to be an article on anything but the U.S. state of Georgia. In the context of the American Civil War, this is the clear primary Georgia. This is also consistent with other titles relating to Georgia in U.S. history, such as Trustee Georgia and Georgia in the American Revolution. bd2412 T 14:47, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support, top points for nominations, Gregkaye ✍♪ 17:56, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Seems logical.--Yaksar (let's chat) 18:07, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support - per nom. Rjensen (talk) 18:55, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support - logical name convention ... GELongstreet (talk) 19:50, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Nom's argument makes sense. Egsan Bacon (talk) 23:37, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support there is no reason for anyone to assume that the country of the same name was involved in this war.--69.157.252.247 (talk) 00:24, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Snow Support. No need for a parenthetical disambiguator in this article title; the rest of the article title is a natural disambiguator (per WP:NCDAB). Since this pagespace has been moved and moved back previously, User:Hmains might have better served the community by creating a requested move discussion like this one prior to the last move. It appears consensus doesn't agree with that editor's reasoning given in edit summary, "standard name convention for such articles". BusterD (talk) 01:21, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
comment I changed the article name to match its parent category name, Category:Georgia (U.S. state) in the American Civil War and other subcategories within that parent category. This discussion makes no mention of this category situation and is thus incomplete and misleading. And we all know that the category names, with (U.S. state) in them, will not change: all requests to change any of them are repeatedly rejected. Why insist on having a main article of a category not match the category name? What is the benefit here to the WP reader? Hmains (talk) 01:35, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll bow to Hmains's more extensive history with the naming issue here. However, since recently there was a rather spirited discussion in CFD (a process I follow on an irregular basis), I would have liked to have been made aware of it in this space, by edit summary or talk page entry. I see good points on both sides. For my part, I find the criteria at WP:NAMING leads me to prefer NOT having the disambiguator in this pagespace, consistency being a lower priority (IMHO) than conciseness, naturalness, and precision. We may need to host a larger discussion, since this process so far is quite one-sided. BusterD (talk) 02:01, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - It is common to drop disambiguators or otherwise use shorter forms for titles on subtopics where there is little chance for ambiguity. See, for example:
    Madonna (entertainer), but Madonna bibliography
    
    Usher (entertainer), but Usher discography
    
    Brandy Norwood, but Brandy discography and List of songs recorded by Brandy
    
    Hillary Rodham Clinton but Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, 2008
    
    Wolverine (character) but Wolverine in other media
    
    and of course Georgia (U.S. state), but Georgia in the American Revolution.
  - bd2412 T 03:14, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Also, by the way, this extends to distinctions between articles and their containing categories. For example, Category:Madonna (entertainer) concert tours is the category, but the lead article is List of Madonna concert tours. Cheers! bd2412 T 15:14, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support and also move the category Red Slash 20:36, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per nom and later explanation by nom. (I would not quarrel with BusterD's comment.) Donner60 (talk) 01:42, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support and WP:Speedy close/move. --В²C ☎ 07:40, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Whilst I believe Georgia usually does require disambiguation on Wikipedia this is a clear case of where it does not. Zarcadia (talk) 12:45, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Since the contribution of the area of Russia (as it was then) to the ACW was doubtless negligible at best! Disambiguation for dogma's sake is pointless and makes Wikipedia look daft. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:21, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

New lede 22/12/15

I realise that my new lede does not entirely summarise the main article. But the earlier one didn’t either, and I feel that the new one summarises the topic better, so it might be the main article that needs to be edited accordingly. Valetude (talk) 11:22, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 7 external links on Georgia in the American Civil War. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://civilwarcauses.org/reasons.htm
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.civilwar.org/education/history/civil-war-overview/why-non-slaveholding.html
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.americanheritage.com/content/south%E2%80%99s-inner-civil-war-0
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.americanheritage.com/content/south%E2%80%99s-inner-civil-war-0
Attempted to fix sourcing for https://books.google.com/books?id=N48LAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA97&lpg=PA97&dq=%22howell+cobb%22+%22soldiers+of+slaves%22&source=bl&ots=kxO5xZwwr3&sig=HV6CCacydzUmjOpdEhjJ3uKR8rU&hl=en&ei=d8fETLXiB4G0lQfN9IEG&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result#v=onepage&q=%22howell%20cobb%22%20%22soldiers%20of%20slaves%22&f=false
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://deadconfederates.com/2015/01/08/real-confederates-didnt-know-about-black-confederates-2/
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://cwmemory.com/2015/01/07/the-most-pernicious-idea-150-years-later

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:08, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Georgia in the American Civil War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:02, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Georgia in the American Civil War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/19980128034930/http://sunsite.utk.edu/civil-war/reasons.html to http://sunsite.utk.edu/civil-war/reasons.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:04, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]