Talk:Aurora Bridge/GA1

GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

One note about the article that confused me right away. I was expecting an article on a bridge in New York, not the Seattle area. I suggest adding a hatnote to redirect people to George Washington Bridge.

Done. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 22:16, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see what you're saying now. I've added a hatnote to this article for that one. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 22:32, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
The design section is a bit technical in reading. Can it be expanded with some explanations to us lay-people? Doesn't need a lot, just a few explanatory comments.
Done (I hope). Cumulus Clouds (talk) 22:27, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
There is a paragraph of the History section missing references. The first paragraph needs a reference for the opening date. There's a bit of overlinking in the references. Only the first reference by each source needs a wikilink to it. Also, some of the newspaper sources include a "The" in front of the title and some don't, and author formatting is inconsistent. Either they all should be Last, First or all First Last.
Done. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 22:13, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Although I found the summary on the phone photo to be quite unique... it doesn't specify where it was taken on the image page. I'm going to AGF that it was on this bridge though. A further suggestion is to get the photos geotagged, something I only learned recently how to do myself.
Done. Replaced image with commons copy and geotagged. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 21:59, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
I'll hold the article for the above issues to be cleared up before making the final judgement. Imzadi1979 (talk) 00:47, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
All issues cleared to my satisfaction. Congrats, it's a pass. 08:47, 8 September 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Imzadi1979 (talk • contribs)