Talk:George Acworth (Anglican divine)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

University of Cambridge

This article is within the scope of the University of Cambridge WikiProject, an attempt to improve articles relating to the University of Cambridge, and to standardize and extend the coverage of the University in the encyclopedia. If you would like to participate, you can help us by editing the article attached to this notice, or you could visit the project page, where you can join the project, learn more about it, see what needs to be done, or contribute to the discussion.University of CambridgeWikipedia:WikiProject University of CambridgeTemplate:WikiProject University of CambridgeUniversity of Cambridge articles

Anglicanism Low‑importance

	George Acworth (Anglican divine) is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AnglicanismWikipedia:WikiProject AnglicanismTemplate:WikiProject AnglicanismAnglicanism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 01 September 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to George Acworth (Anglican divine), which got the most support and there was a clear consensus to move away from the current title. No prejudice against future discussion. Jenks24 (talk) 10:05, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

George Acworth (divine) → George Acworth (protestant) – LOL - very ambiguous topic clarification – Greg Kaye 07:00, 1 September 2015 (UTC) Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 09:19, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@GregKaye:This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 08:57, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - not ambiguous. "Divine" is a noun. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 10:05, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Move to George Acworth (Anglican divine) per Anglican divine since he isn't divine. The disambiguator does not match the topic found at divine so it is a very bad disambiguator, since we are not saying this person is a divinity. Ambiguous disambiguation is a bad idea -- 70.51.202.113 (talk) 04:45, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Move to George Acworth (minister) or George Acworth (clergyman). While "divine" is a perfectly reasonable word it is also very old-fashioned. But George Acworth (lawyer) is probably even better, given that seems to be what he was predominantly known for. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:42, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support , (Anglican divine), or (Anglican advocate/lawyer) or similar, present title may be ecclesiastically correct but is very misleading to a layperson.Pincrete (talk) 20:15, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ps is this necessary? Since there are only two 'George Acworth's and 'about … see' would redirect effectively.Pincrete (talk) 20:23, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment there are seven articles at similarly disambiguated titles at Category:English chaplains. I would like to request that similar moves might apply to:

John Aglionby (divine) →

Thomas Archer (divine) →

Henry Bagshaw (divine) →

William Ford (divine) →

Richard Gardiner (divine) →

John Groome (divine) →

Arthur Young (divine) →

I support the format as George Acworth (Anglican divine). As noted by the IP contributing editor above, the person is not divine although 'e may be associated with being divine by Anglicans. Greg Kaye 21:10, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.