Talk:Gaya–Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Junction section

India: Bihar / Uttar Pradesh / Railways / Transport Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Bihar (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Uttar Pradesh (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indian railways (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Transport in India workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).

Trains: in India Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indian railways.

It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

On 16 July 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to Gaya - Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Junction section. The result of the discussion was moved to Gaya–Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Junction section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gaya–Mughalsarai section. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140112090715/http://www.ecr.indianrailways.gov.in:80/ to http://www.ecr.indianrailways.gov.in/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:43, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 16 July 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved to Gaya–Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Junction section. (closed by non-admin page mover) CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} 19:06, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gaya–Mughalsarai section → Gaya - Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Junction section – station name changed Anubhavklal (talk) 15:31, 16 July 2023 (UTC)— Relisting. —usernamekiran (talk) 16:48, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - For the time period after the name change till today (1 Jun 2018 – 16 Jul 2023), "Gaya–Mughalsarai section" in quotes gets me "ONE" in Google/News, while "Gaya - Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Junction section" in quotes gets me "ZERO". - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:46, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support : After the discussion and move of Mughalsarai Junction to Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Junction railway station all subsequent related pages should be moved too. Let's not confuse wiki readers by having two different parallel names on Wikipedia of same thing. –JayB91 (talk) 22:41, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per JayB91 after the move of Mughalsarai Junction to Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Junction railway station all subsequent related pages should be moved too.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:01, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not with a hyphen. It looks like that hyphen should be an en dash, and I wonder about the spaces around it. I can't think of any legitimate use of a spaced hyphen on Wikipedia. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 17:07, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not with a hyphen. This calls for an en dash like the original title. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 02:33, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Should there be spaces around the en dash? —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 02:42, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  - I would have said yes, because one of the elements separated by it (Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Junction) is a multi-part phrase. But MoS no longer seems to have a line-item about this, so either someone removed it randomly or there was a consensus discussion to remove it; I'm not sure which. MoS now provides an example like this that is not spaced: Seifert–van Kampen theorem which I would have expected to be Seifert – van Kampen theorem. So, I guess "unspaced" is the answer now. If that changes later, the page can always be moved again. I've raised a question about this at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#Spacing of en dash between multi-word elements; I'm curious what happened to the spacing. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 04:11, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    - Agree; "unspaced" is the answer now, like the MOS:ENBETWEEN example of "New York–Los Angeles flight". —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 06:26, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.