Talk:Garratt v. Dailey

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Worst brief I've ever read. Read the full case and brief this case yourself: Garratt v. Daily [46 Wash.2d 197].

WP:SIG To (192.195.155.90), Kindly sign your posts. Wermsker (talk) 06:49, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reboot

Several years of edits since (192.195.155.90)'s "worst" comment (supra) has done little to improve this topic. I've rebooted the topic with ground-up rewrite. Wermsker (talk) 06:49, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Outcome after remanded for clarification

The article claims that "Subsequently, the trial Court found in favor of Garratt and was affirmed by the state Supreme Court." but there is citation. I cannot verify this information. I think it should be removed unless someone can find an actual source. Leafcathead (talk) 20:04, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]