Jump to content

Talk:Garfield's Halloween Adventure

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Cuts in halloween adventure?

[edit]

Originally I remember seeing Garfield taking a ring from the treasure and the ghosts showing up at his front door near the end looking for it. Am I completely nuts or did this happen? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.233.221.217 (talk) 03:06, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That was the book, not the tv speacial 50.46.237.146 (talk) 15:54, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I fairly certain I remember it also being in the cartoon ( was one of the troubling memories of my early childhood) before the name change. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.233.221.217 (talk) 00:01, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I still have my VHS recording of the special's original 1985 debut, and the long-rumored "missing scene" at the end of the film is NOT in it. It's only in the book adaptation, which may indicate it was originally in the script, but if it was actually animated it was deleted in post-production before the final version aired. -- Michael24, 1:27PM October 30, 2012 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael24 (talkcontribs) 20:28, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What would also be typed in addition to this is as follows : Garfield REALLY had business being at that house , pardon my sardonic attitude. It was some one else's property , who didn't. want to be bothered. 162.154.52.166 (talk) 02:03, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Home Release

[edit]

I will add a section on this if no one objects. ---donbruno (talk) 21:38, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest renaming

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Wikipedia uses the original titles for Star Wars (film) and Raiders of the Lost Ark, so why not Garfield In Disguise? Ribbet32 (talk) 21:38, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Your rename proposal is dumb. Ribbet32 (talk) 20:35, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.