Jump to content

Talk:Bellatrix

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Gamma Orionis)

Rename to Bellatrix

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 20:50, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]



Gamma OrionisBellatrix — In 1603 the astronomer Johann Bayer published 'Uranometria', the first atlas of the whole sky, seen with the naked eye. He named each star with a code name: a Greek letter and the genitive form of the constellation's name. Hence Bellatrix is designated 'Gamma Orionis'. The brightest stars have been given individual names such as Vega, Sirius and Rigel. The Wikipedia articles aren't called 'Alpha Lyrae', 'Alpha Canis Majoris' or 'Beta Orionis'. So why is the Bellatrix article called 'Gamma Orionis'?

This article was created in 2004 as 'Bellatrix' but in 2005 [1] 'Bellatrix' was moved to 'Gamma Orionis', without any discussion. AFAIK it was done because of Harry Potter's Bellatrix Lestrange and there weren't disambiguation in those days. Bellatrix is bright enough to have its name as the article name. It would also improve Category:Stars with proper names. --Regards, Necessary Evil (talk) 14:47, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bellatrix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:19, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

its amazing size

[edit]

Very large star Abhishek Singh Rawat (talk) 17:51, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]