Talk:Galloway's Plan of Union

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States History

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject United States History To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : United States History articles needing attention
Infobox : United States History articles needing infoboxes
Stubs : Stub-Class United States History articles, Category:United States history stubs
Other :
- Place either of the following WikiProject banners on United States History-related articles and assess:
  - {{WikiProject United States History|class=|importance=}}
  - {{WikiProject United States|class=|importance=|UShistory=Yes|UShistory-importance=}}

I dont understand what was the petition signed by the king that allowed colonists to have certain freedoms —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.121.245.234 (talk) 23:46, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Further clarification is needed regarding a couple points. First, if the Suffolk Resolves were endorsed on Sept. 17, reiterated in pan-Colonial form in the Declarations on Oct. 14, and enforced via the creation of the Continental Association on Oct. 22, why was Galloway's plan not rejected until Oct. 22? And if there were 56 delegates to the Congress, how is it that the Plan was rejected "5 to 6"? Vincent pearse (talk) 16:12, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

With regard to your last question, voting in Congress was by colony not by individual members. Lord Cornwallis (talk) 17:21, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Galloway's Plan of Union. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402104121/http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/related/planforunion.htm to http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/related/planforunion.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:57, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Britain's response

There's no mention of what the British government in London thought of the plan, or if it had a chance of being accepted by Parliament even if the colonies had passed the plan. - BilCat (talk) 21:48, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]