Talk:Gaisal train collision

India: Railways Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indian railways (assessed as Mid-importance).

Trains

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Move?

This should probably be moved to "Gaisal train disaster" as (a) it occurred at Gaisal, not Gauhati and (b) train disaster seems to be the naming convention, not rail disaster. --Gurubrahma 17:04, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 17:58, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Death toll

The introductory paragraph of this article states that "at least 290" people were killed, but several other places in the article, including the infobox, claim the death toll is precisely 285.

Which is the accurate number? Is it a contested figure (if so, by who)? What's the best reliable source for this figure?

—Idarin ^{talk | contribs} 20:34, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gaisal train disaster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:40, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gaisal train disaster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:31, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 5 June 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved to Gaisal train collision. The discussion reached a consensus that the term "disaster" should be avoided, but no consensus on whether to add the year. (closed by non-admin page mover) ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 19:48, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gaisal train disaster → 1999 Gaisal rail collision – per WP:DISASTER: "Try to avoid the words disaster, tragedy and crisis because this characterization is too subjective. It is preferable to use specific event names, such as collision, collapse, explosion, outbreak, pandemic, sinking, oil spill, and the like. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:48, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: page was moved to 1999 Gaisal train disaster on 3 June 2023 without discussion and was just reverted. Since the current title turned into a redirect and redirects are ineligible to be current titles in move requests, the current title was changed back to the status quo name, "Gaisal train disaster", to fix the malformity for the RMCD bot. Nom may feel free to alter the suggested new title as needed. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^{put'er there} 15:13, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose using the year per WP:NOYEAR, but support alternative Gaisal train collision per WP:NCE#Road and rail. --wooden superman 12:36, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.