Talk:G-Spot amplification

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 January 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Prod for deletion

I'm prodding this article for deletion because none of the references here show any evidence that this is WP:NOTABLE, and none of the references are WP:RELIABLE SOURCES. Jefffire (talk) 19:31, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I deprodded after finding additional refs at G News Archive: [1]. There is also one PubMed references: [2] from an absolutely reliable journal (which calls it "G-spot amplification"). I have changed the title accordingly,. DGG ( talk ) 04:30, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That is a vast improvement. The previous article just looked like an ad for the company. Jefffire (talk) 20:05, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Like I stated in this edit summary, I "[m]erged G-Spot amplification into [the G-Spot] article as there isn't enough material on the topic, especially medical material, for th[is] article to significantly grow beyond what it was. Not to mention, medical authorities are against the surgery." Flyer22 (talk) 02:55, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]