Talk:Future self

Future self was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (August 11, 2019). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

This article was nominated for deletion on 14 November 2018. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Untitled

Hello! I wrote this article to share an exciting stream of psychological research about the future self. I am a new contributor, and I typically write for academic audiences. I would love help improving the style of the article to be more encyclopedic and less essay-like. Please share your thoughts, comments, edits! Thanks! JSRpsych (talk) 01:16, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): JSRpsych.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:31, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Future self article

I instantly thought of meditation and self help when I first saw the title future article future self article and it should be added to note that meditation yoga in the health and wellness industry are to be added into the article Montywiggins1 (talk) 22:44, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Future self/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: BlackfullaLinguist (talk · contribs) 13:01, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I have started a review, this is only my second one ever, so please bear with me. I have made a few notes:

1. The lead does not adequately summarise the article. Try expanding it with a better definition, connect it to a field of psychology perhaps, and a few more hyperlinks. See WP:LEAD for more information

2. Some sections do not seem broad or detailed enough, the 'delayed gratification' section is a sentence long, and has one man's theory.

3. It is not very neutral and should have perspectives and theories from others in the field as well.

BlackfullaLinguist (talk) 13:01, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have put the review on hold, users have 7 days to make the suggested edits or I will close the review. BlackfullaLinguist (talk) 12:42, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]