Talk:Pacemaker current

Physiology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to the physiology of the heart.

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This doesn't make much sense:

Passing through so don't have time to think about what is actually being said to correct it but this passage doesn't make a lot of sense:

"Funny current seems a term quite close to a diastolic EKG if inexpensively and reproducibly captured by other researchers. Most authorities believe Diastole to be a passive relaxation phase. Work regarding Funny Current is important and suggests an electrical backswing to the forward electrical drive visible on the EKG if the electrical signature of Systole QRS Interval (medicine] is dampened for a better view of the following ST Segment. Most neurological study of the heart illuminates Systole under Sympathetic influence. Funny Current is likely an illumination of Parasympathetic electrical influence in Diastole."

Arfgab (talk) 19:10, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I concur. It's unsalvageable. Deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.25.54.191 (talk) 00:18, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]