Talk:French destroyer Le Terrible

French destroyer Le Terrible has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: September 4, 2019. (Reviewed version).

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / European / French / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	World War II task force

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Shipwrecks Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shipwrecks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of shipwreck-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShipwrecksWikipedia:WikiProject ShipwrecksTemplate:WikiProject ShipwrecksShipwreck articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Shipwreck-related priority open tasks:

To Do

Lady Elizabeth (1879)
- Clean up typos Currently working on it-----Completed!
- Improve grammar
- Add any additions if needed Still adding more information
- Discuss desired additions -None

Requested move 3 April 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: consensus to move the page, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 21:05, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

French destroyer Terrible → French destroyer Le Terrible – WP:Article titles - name most commonly used and WP:Naming conventions (ships) - format. Refer to text, references, sources and links in article to confirm that for this ship Le forms part of the ship name Lyndaship (talk) 11:51, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support - per the class article, all vessels similarly prefixed per French grammar rules. Mjroots (talk) 17:05, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per common name (404,000 results for current name on Google, vs only 372,000 for changed name.) -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 12:52, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support, yes I have indeed [quite embarrassingly] failed to put quotes around search terms. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 04:03, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Interesting. How do you do that? I would point out that WP:COMMONNAME and WP:ARTICLETITLE both state that the article title should be what the subject is called in reliable English language sources. Does Google qualify? All of the existing sources given in the article call the ship Le Terrible as do Couhat and Le Masson which I would used to rewrite the article. This class consists of 6 ships all of which had Le or L' as part of the name, currently 2 on Wiki have it and the other 4 I am requesting a name change, 2 you support, 2 you oppose. I think we should be consistent Lyndaship (talk) 14:08, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Those are pretty close figures, I'd say. Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 15:42, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Google is not a decisive RS for an encyclopedical name. It may be supportive when there is a convincing difference, but not when it is this close. - DePiep (talk) 15:50, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I get 637 for the first, 1540 for the second. This is not really how the title should be chosen, but it appears that User:Iazyges is forgetting to put search terms in quotes when using Google. Dekimasuよ! 20:52, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support. I see no reason Wikipedia may cut in the formal name. - DePiep (talk) 15:50, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support. No strong reason to modify a proper name, which also changes the meaning, as shown in the article (= a noun "the terrible one", not adjective "terrible"). And we should be very cautious about following sources which are known to be wrong. Davidships (talk) 09:14, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.