Talk:Freedom of Mobile Multimedia Access

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

"Compatible with UMTS"

I think this needs to be explained in more detail. Saying they share the same air interface standard doesn't really help a lot, and it's nice they both support USIMs, but presumably the rest of the system is entirely different.

Is the implication that it's easy to make a cross-platform phone that supports both standards?

Or is the implication that the protocols are now standardized? In which case, what's the difference between FOMA and UMTS?

The way I see it, the "compatible" thing (at least at the air interface level) could mean:

1. You can run both UMTS and FOMA in the same spectrum (just as you can run NETBIOS, IPX/SPX, and TCP/IP over the same network using the same NICs, because they all run over Ethernet)

2. You can't, but you can make a UMTS phone also support FOMA very easily because the changes are high-level enough to merely require software changes.

3. FOMA and UMTS are, in fact, almost identical. UMTS and FOMA set up calls the same way, they use the same codecs, they identify users the same way, one is just a superset of the other. Kind of like USIMs and RUIMs are compatible with SIMs, to a standard GSM phone they both look identical to SIMs, it's just they support more commands.

What's the deal here? Does anyone know the answer? Google doesn't really help here.

Re:"Compatible with UMTS"

I’m Japanese. So I’m sorry that probably my English has many wrong.

FOMA of something to check first is not the name of a specification but a name of service.

I actually use FOMA service. In bygone years, FOMA was incompatible with other W-CDMA service, because FOMA’s start was too fast to use “R99” service.

Out of time, in Japan, Vodafone 3G(now Softbank 3G) use W-CDMA which is R4. it was enough late to use R4 service.

But NTT DoCoMo upgraded FOMA to compatible R99 or R5 (HSDPA) service. So FOMA service can use by other W-CDMA phone now.

And from the first, FOMA’s SIM Card have compatibility.

Probably without sim lock ,other W-CDMA or GSM phone support FOMA Card.

mova

What's mova, I didn't see it described, just referenced. Mathiastck (talk) 19:08, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Freedom of Mobile Multimedia Access. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091229110830/http://www.icmrindia.org:80/pdf/Business%20Strategy%20Case%20Study%20-%20DoCoMo.pdf to http://www.icmrindia.org/pdf/Business%20Strategy%20Case%20Study%20-%20DoCoMo.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:17, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Freedom of Mobile Multimedia Access. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090421060836/http://www.nttdocomo.co.jp/service/func_tool/high_speed/ to http://www.nttdocomo.co.jp/service/func_tool/high_speed/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:22, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]