Talk:Free and Open Indo-Pacific

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 16 January 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 05:13, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Free and Open Indo–Pacific → Free and Open Indo-Pacific – Indo–Pacific should be changed to Indo-Pacific (replacing en dash with hyphen). All sources in this article use hyphen, not en dash. Neo-Jay (talk) 05:35, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

List of nation-states that use the term

It might help to define the global context for the reader to have a list and/or map of countries that use the term regularly regarding foreign policy and those that avoid or deride it. Doyna Yar (talk) 19:49, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Karl Haushofer

This article is disputing one of the claims in this article:

"However, it is possibly of greatest significance that this claim of Haushofer’s influence on contemporary Japanese, but not only Japanese, foreign policy is uncritically reproduced as fact on the Wikipedia sites on the “Free and Open Indo-Pacific” and the “Indo-Pacific”.[23] This claim, as I will illustrate, is factually incorrect. " https://trafo.hypotheses.org/50314 --2003:C3:2F31:F700:14BF:1E30:A693:270F (talk) 16:24, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]