Talk:François' langur

Error

Is this correct? "Before 1990, Francois' Langur could be found in 23 different countries"

What 23 countries would that be? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.232.24.252 (talk) 13:05, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, the references talks about 23 counties within the province of Guangxi. Sorry it took so long to correct! Cheers, Jack (talk) 13:00, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to François' langur. Favonian (talk) 10:54, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Francois' langur → François' langur – The spelling used by MSW3, IUCN, and the majority of papers on Google Scholar (10/14 from first 20 results). Jack (talk) 12:04, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Diacritics are important distinctions. They improve precision in naming, and redirect deal with users' inability to enter them. - UtherSRG (talk) 18:32, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above. – Maky ^« talk » 02:43, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support, per nomination. Of course we'll leave a redirect behind... bobrayner (talk) 21:04, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Baby langur born at Taronga Zoo

Per ABC source. I was wondering how significant this is, though considering they are endangered possibly any birth in captivity is significant?

Also includes this info not in the artcile:

"...usually born with bright orange hair, ... Their hair slowly changes until it becomes black when they are about one-year-old."

- 220 of ^Borg 10:36, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]