Jump to content

Talk:Francis Sargent

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Huh? Could somebody explain the relevance: "On occasion, groups of anti-busing protesters from the city showed up to picket his Dover home, only to find that his road had no street lights."140.247.248.146 (talk) 02:57, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Singular curiosity

[edit]

"William", eh?

--Jim Luedke Jimlue (talk) 01:55, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Boston Brahmin?

[edit]

Does Sargent belong to any of the famous Boston Brahmin families? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.49.5.219 (talk) 23:56, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Francis Sargent. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:21, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article needs overhaul

[edit]

I did some preliminary copyediting, but the article needs major reworking. The one-sentence intro was a run-on right into the body of the article, so I separated it in accordance with standard Wikipedia structuring. A few more lines can be added to the intro to summarize, once the rest of the article is in good shape.

The Willie Horton incident has its own extensive and well-documented article, but it is inappropriate to rehash it at length here, when it occurred many years after Sargent left office. Any linkage to Sargent's administration can be summarized in a sentence or two.

The overall problem with the article is lack of balance. Disproportionate amounts of text are given to some things, while other areas are ignored. I am not an expert on Sargent, so I hope others can pitch in. Otherwise, I will do the best I can, starting by trimming some of the superfluous coverage which is already better done in other Wikilinked articles. Reify-tech (talk) 16:37, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Reify-tech: I've done some reorganizing, and added information and cites. There is one section that I didn't look at, which may be okay - "Policies as governor", and one that clearly is problematical - "Anti Inner Belt" (long quotations are almost always unacceptable in Wikipedia articles). -- John Broughton (♫♫) 21:37, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]