Talk:Francis Dee

Requested move 4 June 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: move. (closed by non-admin page mover) DannyS712 (talk) 02:06, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Francis Dee (bishop) → Francis Dee – This should be probably considered an uncontroversial technical move, however, taking into account that the main header for the bishop's page has remained unchanged since its creation nearly ten years ago (August 2009), an RM might be appropriate for the historical record. The two-entry Francis Dee disambiguation page (with one duplicate "See also" entry for Frances Dee), created in 2012 from a 2006 redirect to Frances Dee, is unnecessary since Wikipedia has only a single entry for Francis Dee and a single entry for Frances Dee where a hatnote specifies, "Not to be confused with Francis Dee." Another hatnote atop Francis Dee is all that is needed. — Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 20:26, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. No other use of the name, a hatnote for each article is all that's needed. PC78 (talk) 10:49, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Uncontroversial. A hatnote is fine to point to the actress. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:53, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:39, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.