Talk:Francis Eric Bloy

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Anglicanism Low‑importance

	Francis Eric Bloy is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AnglicanismWikipedia:WikiProject AnglicanismTemplate:WikiProject AnglicanismAnglicanism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

F. Eric

I think this page should be back under "Francis Eric Bloy." Here's why: 1) Almost all bishops' pages are under their full names. 2) References I've found on the Web call him F. Eric Bloy, not Francis E. Bloy, so Francis Bloy would not be the expected title for his page (Eric Bloy would be more in keeping with what he was called, though I wouldn't advocate naming it that either.) While the Episcopal Church Annual lists him as "Francis E. I. Bloy" in its succession list, the Diocese of L.A.'s listing has him as F. Eric Bloy. ~ InkQuill 05:27, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, for all the reasons you've mentioned. In formal writing in the Episcopal Church, bishop's almost always get all their names. -- BPMullins | Talk 20:51, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]