Jump to content

Talk:Forever & Always

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleForever & Always has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starForever & Always is part of the Fearless (Taylor Swift album) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 7, 2014Articles for deletionKept
December 27, 2019Articles for deletionKept
December 30, 2020Articles for deletionRedirected
December 10, 2021Good article nomineeListed
October 12, 2024Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Requested move

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: consensus to move the page, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 00:23, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Forever & AlwaysForever and Always (Taylor Swift song) – This album track is up for AFD, but with or without, it is not the only subject, nor more notable than all other Forever and Always topics combined. The "&" doesn't predominate in Google Books, most Taylor Swift bios use "and". Forever and Always (Lefty Frizzell song) 1952 is currently a redirect, but clearly the most notable long term (song) topic. In ictu oculi (talk) 21:04, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Andrewa yes it closed as keep. In ictu oculi (talk) 23:34, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 29 October 2016

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: move to Forever & Always (Taylor Swift song). (non-admin closure) JudgeRM (talk to me) 02:37, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Forever and Always (Taylor Swift song)Forever & Always (Taylor Swift song) – The consensus in the 2014 discussion was that the ampersand was not sufficient disambiguation for the article to simply be titled Forever & Always. That does not indicate consensus for Wikipedia to change the name of the song as it appears on Swift's album, or as it is reported in reliable sources. Chase (talk | contributions) 03:30, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Suggestion

[edit]

User:HĐ The first half of the paragraph you wrote into Composition and Reception..{ In "Forever & Always", Swift sings about her relationship with a boyfriend, who still "hasn't called" despite the fact that at an earlier point in their relationship, he had declared that they would be together "forever and always". } seems to deem better fit in the ‘Background & recording’ section of the article to me. Let me know your thoughts! Elvisisalive95 (talk) 01:46, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think it fits better in the "Composition" section because it discusses the lyrical content. Regardless, you could just edit the article if you find something needing to be addressed without having to ask me :) (talk) 01:53, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:HĐ trout Self-trout My apologies for bothering you, I thought that was the best way to go about revising an edit from a Veteran such as yourself! Take care! Elvisisalive95 (talk) 02:21, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No worries--even veterans make mistakes (though I do not identify as one), so just be bold and do what you think is right. Best, (talk) 04:19, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why?

[edit]

@Doomsdayer520: I realise that you were only doing a TR, and that Tree Critter shouldn't have made a TR counter a historical RM result above, but were there any other factors in implementing the TR which mean the above RM result no longer stands? Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 22:12, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

curprev 16:59, 26 May 2021‎ Doomsdayer520 talk contribs‎ m 10,255 bytes 0‎ Doomsdayer520 moved page Talk:Forever & Always (song) to Talk:Forever & Always without leaving a redirect: request at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests undothank
curprev 15:54, 26 May 2021‎ Tree Critter talk contribs‎ m 10,255 bytes 0‎ Tree Critter moved page Talk:Forever & Always (Taylor Swift song) to Talk:Forever & Always (song): The only article for a song with this title, per WP:SONGDAB undothank
@In ictu oculi: - You already asked me this exact same question nine months ago at multiple talk pages, and my response is the same this time. I handled a page move request for someone who made the request with certain reasoning, and I made a determination about that stupid ampersand based on evidence I could see at the time. Evidence: The title includes the ampersand at Billboard [1], on the back cover of the associated album [2], and the official Taylor Swift website [3]. The "and" is often used mistakenly in commentary by fans and journalists. Or just change the page title back yourself if you think there's reason to do so, and see if anyone objects. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 23:55, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]