Talk:Flora Europaea

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books: Reference works

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article is supported by the Reference works task force.

Europe Low‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article scope

I think this article should be deleted. I doubt this article will expand much. A link to the website should sufice. I'll leave the discussion here for a while before an Afd. --Pfafrich 11:35, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On the contrary. This page exists in order to make a link to it, each time the Flora Europaea database is being mentioned in a botanical article. Otherwise, each time an explanation, short as it may be, has to be given to explain what Flora Europaea is. And there is no need to lengthen this article, unless you're a candidate to do so. JoJan 14:44, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe its better as a Category [:Category:Flora Europaea] or [:Category:European Flora]. That way the link works both ways and it's easy to find which plants are mentioned in the Flora. I'd probably go for the latter, plants native to europe is a little more useful than plants in a book listing plants in europe. --Pfafrich 16:58, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We're not talking here about a list of European plants, but about a huge database at the Royal Botanic Garden in Edinburgh. JoJan 17:36, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that to do this properly would be a mamoth task, I guess there 10,000+ species mentioned in FE. Futhermore it is but one of many databases. The UDSA Plants Database is much more widly known, then there Flora of North America, or even the one I run Plants For A Future database. It might even be useful to a direct reference to the plant in question http://rbg-web2.rbge.org.uk/cgi-bin/nph-readbtree.pl/feout?GENUS_XREF=Salix rather than just to the reference work. --Pfafrich 20:09, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This should be an article about the work itself, not about all the included species. The book has its own history, format, and uses. --EncycloPetey 02:30, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Flora Europaea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070908234910/http://www.fmnh.helsinki.fi/english/botany/afe/index.htm to http://www.fmnh.helsinki.fi/english/botany/afe/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:52, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]