Talk:Flagged Revisions

This article was nominated for deletion on 04:25, 26 January 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was withdrawn.

This article was nominated for deletion on 7 March 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This page was proposed for deletion by Gavia immer (talk · contribs) on 7 March 2010 with the comment:
No article here, just an excuse for a cross-namespace link
It was contested by Soap (talk · contribs) on 2010-03-07 with the comment:
it's MediaWiki, so this could have use for people outside Wikipedia. No objection to an AfD

Wikipedia Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's encyclopedic coverage of itself. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. Please remember to avoid self-references and maintain a neutral point of view, even on topics relating to Wikipedia.WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject WikipediaWikipedia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Interwiki

Can this be linked to a German WP article? -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 09:06, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You mean as an example? Which one? de:Wikipedia maybe? -- œ ^™ 18:51, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What I mean is that if de:Wikipedia has an article on flagged revisions there should be an interwiki link between the articles. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 20:20, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

enwiki is the only one with a mainspace article on Flagged Revisions as far as i know.. I haven't checked them all though, not sure how to do an interwiki search.. -- œ ^™ 04:40, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I sorta checked just now and didn't find anything. This would probably be easier if I spoke German though. Reach Out to the Truth 04:19, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge target?

Do we have somewhere this substub can be merged to? History of Wikipedia perhaps? I understand the argument that it is notable because of all the press coverage of the possible implementation, but I'd argue that is about a reform rather than a technical extension. Skomorokh, barbarian 12:14, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2010 June news coverage

This week's Wikipedia Signpost points to further news coverage that could be useful for expanding this article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2010-06-21/In_the_news#Pending_changes_-_a_victory_for_traditional_models.3F Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 09:56, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]