This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indigenous peoples of the Americas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of the AmericasWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasIndigenous peoples of the Americas articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
What does this first wave include??? Algeria? Not Australia? New Zealand? The Canary Islands and Ceuta? Does it include the Ottoman conquests in the Middle East? It all seems pretty dodgy to me. Should be deleted. Asilah1981 (talk) 16:06, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
On the first map, The Kingdom of England and Wales and their colonies in America are described as "United Kingdom", which didn't exist until 1707.
It should read "Kingdom of England" or "Kingdom of England and Wales". Ralphhalgas (talk) 13:36, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This article is complete WP:OR and WP:SYNTH, and it is inaccurate in numerous details. The Title does not indicate that this is only about colonization of the Americas, only the hint and infobox do. The title and article ignores Norse explorations before the Castilian/Aragonese ("Spanish") and Portuguese conquests. The Netherlands, France, and England are not Northern Europe. The map confuses England with the later United Kingdom. Despite being only about the Americas, one section suddenly elaborates on India, as though someone wanted to make the Article reflect the Title.
The lede functions as the first section instead of introducing the subject. "The Role of the Church" is bad as a first section: the full elaboration of the subject should be the first section.
The entire article reads more like US-centric pseudohistory, or maybe the homework of a middle-school student. ♆ CUSH ♆06:26, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with every point made here.
Your point regarding the anachronistic projection of present-day national identities several hundred years into the past is a particularly sharp observation.
Stripped of any pretence of international context, the actual historical focus of this article — the European discovery, colonisation, and economic exploitation of what was once called the New World — is already well-documented elsewhere on Wikipedia, and to a far higher standard at that. Foxmilder (talk) 12:26, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg)
.svg)
.svg){kind=small}
